Skip to main content

They keep pulling me back in! Kobe's accuser is preggers

"She's not the slut she's been made out to be..." Any time an attorney uses the word "slut" in a declaritive sentence about his client, eyebrows should arch. Hmmmm, couldn't he have finessed that sentence for the cameras just a little? Of course, it doesn't help that the client may, in fact, BE a suicidal, attention-grabbing, slut with a penchant for cocaine abuse. Talk about the trifecta! And now she's pregnant. PREGNANT, people!

That a sexual abuse "victim" can find solace in the arms of another recovering cokehead is touching. And it doesn't NECESSARILY mean that she's been lying the whole time, but let's examine the scorecard. She claims that she has suffered additional abuse as a result of the court, yet again, revealing her name. OK, except that the court mistake didn't put the name out there in the first place. People from her community were e-blasting her within days of the charges. Then came the stories of her exploits at parties, where she allegedly bragged about her encounter with "king-sized" Kobe. Then came the multiple stained panties from the rape exam. The revelation about multiple sex partners within days of the Kobe encounter, yada, yada, yada.

When are these attorneys going to come to their senses? If I were Kobe right now, there would be no settlement offer. Forget it. The transcripts from his initial interview have been put out there. Turnabout is fair play from the prosecution team I guess. At this point, it looks MUCH better for him to have this case tried and for him to be exonerated than to roll over for such an obvious nutjob.

That I feel so compelled to rise to the defense of a blatant adulterer is amazing to me. I'm a family man, yet, here I am typing away... Still, he didn't rape her. And that so many people (let's face it, WHITE people) have rallied behind this chick is galling in the extreme. Maybe after Hurlburt loses his election bid, folks will understand that she is not a victim in the eyes of the community.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Parties are NOT the same.

Thinking about the differences between the Dems and the Trump. Trump is promising "America First" jingoism without delivering anything but racism, while riding the economic tide of his predecessor. Consider what the Dems have been DEMANDED to fix. 1) Healthcare for all Americans 2) Student loan relief 3) A workable immigration solution 4) $15 min. wage and/or guaranteed income 5) Incremental gun regulation 6) Protecting the environment 7) Iran nuclear treaty 8) Thwarting Russian election interference 9) Reparations 10) Lowering taxes for middle class 11) Raising taxes for the 1% 12) Improving K-12 education 13) Rolling back Citizens United 14) Protecting Roe v. Wade 15) A satisfying DC Cinematic Universe (why not?) It's perfectly fine to be in your feelings if you are upset that this country is so f*cked that your particular issue is not being trumpeted by all (or any) of the Democratic primary candidates. It's even OK if you feel that the cur...

Open Letter to GOP recruiters

To whom it may concern: I am a telegenic, articulate, working, married father of two who owns his own house and a small business. Before you come knocking on my door, there are a few ground rules. Rule No. 1 No discussion of "The Party of Lincoln" without claiming Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms too. I know American history well enough, thank you. I also know that Thurmond was only a Democrat until the party decided to stand up for the rights of Black people. Then he jumped ship (while denying his own half-Black daughter) and led the drive to keeping a strong segregated state. Leave Lincoln in his grave (besides, we both know he didn't really emancipate very many don't we?) Rule No. 2 Liberal is not a bad word. It does not mean that Democrats love big government and spending tax dollars foolishly. That's Bush's job. Nor does it mean that I have been stroked and manipulated by a Leftist cabal that wants to think for me. Convince me on the merits of what YOU ...

What's this talk about "Hillary's time"?

Blog comment threads are full of snippets about voting for McCain if Obama is the Dem candidate. Apparently, supporting someone other than Hillary is a fundamental betrayal of her oft-discussed "35 years" of service to America. Notwithstanding the ridiculous assertion of that much "time in the trenches," I don't buy this argument at all. She was the unelected wife of an Arkansas Governor and a two-term President. Later, ONE STATE elected her to represent them in the Senate. Why exactly does the rest of the country owe her a free pass to the "most powerful political office in the world"? If Gore hadn't been sandbagged by Monicagate, Travelgate, FBI Filegate, Lincoln bedroom "sales", sketchy Chinese donors, NOT TO MENTION Hillary's failed healthcare push, this country might be an entirely different place right now. What about what we owed HIM? or Biden... or Dodd... or Daschle? How is Hillary owed more than any of these solid Dem...