BJ... phi... bruh...
Your tirade about Barack Obama is appalling.
You earned your billion on the backs of ass-slapping videos, blaxploitation reruns and informercials and you have THE GALL to talk about being "insulted" that "we are so stupid?" Back at you, dawg.
Incidentally, NOT ONE PERSON was confused about your thinly veiled reference about Obama's days "in the neighborhood." It was pathetic when the recently dismissed Clintonian flak floated it out there. Coming from you, it's traitorously venomous. We were smart enough to avoid buying tickets to "Who's Your Caddy?" and we're smart enough to understand your half-assed attempt at a smear.
By the way, if you're going to "go there," have the balls to own up to it. Your backtrack about referring to his days as an organizer is even worse than the smear. Are we to understand that Obama's grass roots community leadership is somehow less legitimate than the Clinton's purportedly "deeply and emotionally" involved participation in Black issues? PUH-leeze. It's your smear that is "irresponsible and incorrect."
Obama's campaign has confounded the punditry by transcending the "race politics" that stymied Chisolm, Jackson and Sharpton. People of all ages, races and political leanings are rethinking what it means to be an American and see Obama as a distillation of that bold spirit. It's telling that his message of hope became a target of Hillary's sniping. It's even more telling that she would minimize the efforts of a civil rights legend to reinforce her ever-weakening position. It says even more that she would unleash a poorly-trained attack puppy like you to do her real dirty work.
I know at least one Clinton has a predilection for BJs, but your comments leave a nasty taste in MY mouth.
Bob, sit yo' ass down.
Your tirade about Barack Obama is appalling.
You earned your billion on the backs of ass-slapping videos, blaxploitation reruns and informercials and you have THE GALL to talk about being "insulted" that "we are so stupid?" Back at you, dawg.
Incidentally, NOT ONE PERSON was confused about your thinly veiled reference about Obama's days "in the neighborhood." It was pathetic when the recently dismissed Clintonian flak floated it out there. Coming from you, it's traitorously venomous. We were smart enough to avoid buying tickets to "Who's Your Caddy?" and we're smart enough to understand your half-assed attempt at a smear.
By the way, if you're going to "go there," have the balls to own up to it. Your backtrack about referring to his days as an organizer is even worse than the smear. Are we to understand that Obama's grass roots community leadership is somehow less legitimate than the Clinton's purportedly "deeply and emotionally" involved participation in Black issues? PUH-leeze. It's your smear that is "irresponsible and incorrect."
Obama's campaign has confounded the punditry by transcending the "race politics" that stymied Chisolm, Jackson and Sharpton. People of all ages, races and political leanings are rethinking what it means to be an American and see Obama as a distillation of that bold spirit. It's telling that his message of hope became a target of Hillary's sniping. It's even more telling that she would minimize the efforts of a civil rights legend to reinforce her ever-weakening position. It says even more that she would unleash a poorly-trained attack puppy like you to do her real dirty work.
I know at least one Clinton has a predilection for BJs, but your comments leave a nasty taste in MY mouth.
Bob, sit yo' ass down.
Comments
http://amherstdam.wordpress.com/