Skip to main content

Flag on the Play...

I play referee between two respected blogger/pundits. They happen to be Black. Steve Gilliard kicks things off with a post that defies description. Robert George weighs in after dropping hints to Andrew Sullivan and, one imagines, a few others...

My comments to Steve Gilliard are here. To Robert George here. It seems to me that Steve has pushed the envelop too far, yet again, while Robert has played to "liberals are racist too" card, one more time.

The posts are racking up on both sites... Definitely worth a look see...

Comments

TomIsTalking said…
My point exactly... It is disingenuous in the extreme for Robert to toss Steve's hyper-left stylings as a crutch for his politics. On the other hand, I can't stomach Steve's WAY over the top post on Steele. It's not exactly news that Steele is a staunch conservative. Driving home the point with incidiary imagery doesn't really advance his aims.
Alton, with all due respect, when have I played the "liberals are racist too" card?

Yes, in criticizing Gilliard, I used the phrase "IOKIYAL" in the context of racist imagery, but that was mocking the liberal-blog phrase IOKIYAR (It's OK if you are Republican) as much as anything. Be fair and look over my blog or any of my other writings and show me where I've used "liberals are racist" as some regular mantra. On the contrary, while I've often criticized the impact of liberal policies on black people, I've also said that the movement and the GOP have a heavier burden because of various tactical decisions such as Goldwater choosing to toss off a century or more of black support to get white votes in the '64 election -- and the subsequent "Southern strategy" that developed.
TomIsTalking said…
The categorization was a cast-off, and not intended to be an in-depth analysis of your positions; perhaps, "liberals espouse racial denigration when considered efficacious" is a better way to phrase the vibe of your "Why I am still..." and "Why I'm not..." pieces. The "Still Republican" post was my first exposure to you, so that framed my impression on the recent piece.

That said, the title of your piece and it's brevity (before updates) left little to go on except that Steve's racist tirade was a "reason" that the Democrats held no appeal for you. I still contend that Steve's excessive style hardly represents a fair anti-Democratic talking point. As I've posted, there are jerks on both sides of the aisle.

Despite Kelso's categorizations, I seek to see both sides of an issue, before I make my opinion known. We landed on the same side of Steve's outrageous post; but I cannot follow you into a rationalization of conservative superiority on that basis.

Being a moderate certainly hasn't amped my page views, but it keeps MY VIEWS honest.

P.S. I hope you saw my post about Nighthawk and have given it a chance.

Popular posts from this blog

Missy DID HER THANG!

So it's a MAJOR night for some of my faves. Missy. DID. the DAMN. THANG. Side note: Describe J Lo's performance from last year. Can't do it? Thass what I thought. NikkiFree Wiggins  said she will have floor seats if Missy goes on tour. Hell, I wanna be the dude pulling her off stage on the wheeled transport for costume changes. Note to camera operators. When you have a BUILDING FULL of people singing Missy lyrics word for word, DO NOT WASTE CUTS to Taylor Swift's poseur azz shimmying her narrow shoulders in a jacket designed to be editorial. Ma'am, you don't deserve to be featured if you're not a fan. And certainly not multiple times. And CERTAINLYcertainly not in an extended take that took precious seconds from my Missy stanning during Lose Control. Also: Put your tongue back in your mouf, Swift. Back to Missy... Am I the only one who thought that they built the entire VMA set specifically to highlight Missy? That was DAMN-ed impressive. FRfr. I m...

Ashley Todd

Y'all know the story by now. White, female McCain phonebanker, Ashley Todd, leaves Texas to venture North to support her candidate. After a stint in New York, she ends up in Pittsburgh until Thursday, when she lost her effing mind and became Susan Smith Part Deux . The McCain campaign can hardly be blamed for this girl's actions. However, they need to be questioned on their response. Within hours of the incendiary allegations, two things happened. McCain and Palin called Ashley Todd. A press flack from McCain's Pennsylvania operation started pushing the story and adding salacious details. Consider what was at stake here. In a campaign environment already marked with strained racial tensions, Todd's story was potenitally explosive. It would have made a lot more sense to issue a generic statement (like Obama's campaign did). Instead, McCain and Palin lent legitimacy to the allegations (at least for a few hours) by calling her. They vetted Todd's story abou...

Green Book? Nah, Son.

My last Green Book post... Maybe. I was considering all the backlash over the #BrownBook win and feeling pretty good about myself when I realized one of the most glaring lies about the "racial reconciliation" message of this "well-meaning" movie. And it's a BIG lie. I'm 50 years old. Green Book is set in 1962. In other words, six years before I was born. The movie would have us believe that "Lip" Villelonga's "radical transformation" about race is a proxy for how society has changed in those 56 years. Bruh. The ACADEMY AWARDS hasn't even changed that much in the past 30 Years!!! Y'all remember the 62nd Oscars, right? (No you don't). 1989 was a year when movies like Glory, and Field of Dreams, and Born on the Fourth of July (which rewarded Oliver Stone as Best Director), and Dead Poet's Society, and a LOT of really good movies were released. Google it. You won't BELIEVE how...