It's amazing to me that supporters of other candidates are so willing to make accusations about Obama's "lack of substance" based on... what exactly? He has EXHAUSTIVE policy positions on dozens of subjects on his website. If these "dedicated" Americans were so concerned with the politics in question, they could MORE than satisfy themselves by tipping over www.barackobama.com.
Rather, they offer platitudes of their own... "no experience," "all talk, no action." Their candidate is "solutions instead of speeches" and "ready to lead on day one." Now THERE'S substance!!! How convenient that this script has been supplied by the "more experienced" candidate who has now lost NINE PRIMARIES in a row!
Incidentally, since when has anyone laid out an actual policy IN DETAIL on a stump speech? It's ALWAYS a generic laundry list of policy POSITIONS, not legislative briefs. Hillary talks about her health care plan as though its been signed and implemented. It hasn't. She critiques Obama's plan because it doesn't contain mandates, but neglects to mention that her mandates include WAGE GARNISHMENT. What's the chance you'll hear THAT little factoid on the campaign trail?
If a string of losses combined with a desperation loan of five million dollars sounds like the type of "leadership" this country needs, I don't know who you'll vote for in November. At any rate, Hillary WILL NOT be the Democratic candidate.
Rather, they offer platitudes of their own... "no experience," "all talk, no action." Their candidate is "solutions instead of speeches" and "ready to lead on day one." Now THERE'S substance!!! How convenient that this script has been supplied by the "more experienced" candidate who has now lost NINE PRIMARIES in a row!
Incidentally, since when has anyone laid out an actual policy IN DETAIL on a stump speech? It's ALWAYS a generic laundry list of policy POSITIONS, not legislative briefs. Hillary talks about her health care plan as though its been signed and implemented. It hasn't. She critiques Obama's plan because it doesn't contain mandates, but neglects to mention that her mandates include WAGE GARNISHMENT. What's the chance you'll hear THAT little factoid on the campaign trail?
If a string of losses combined with a desperation loan of five million dollars sounds like the type of "leadership" this country needs, I don't know who you'll vote for in November. At any rate, Hillary WILL NOT be the Democratic candidate.
Comments