Palin's most sincere sounding attack was the "Scranton-San Francisco" bit. On its face, it was a withering critique. However, it is particularly hypocritical given her about face on the Ketchikan bridge.
According to Reuters (emphasis mine)...
If that isn't "saying one thing in Ketchikan and another in St. Paul," I don't know what is.
What's worse? These are HER CONSTITUENTS that she used for political fodder. This fact, combined with the recent revelations of her crowing about pork IN HER OWN HANDWRITING are doubly damaging.
As far as I'm concerned, this self-described pit bull in lipstick, has played the victim card for the last time. She has had her "bring it on" moment. Please don't hesitate to confront her on every one of her distortions, lies and politically crafted attack lines.
Pretty please?
According to Reuters (emphasis mine)...
"in 2006, Palin said she was insulted by the term "bridge to nowhere," according to Ketchikan Mayor Bob Weinstein, a Democrat, and Mike Elerding, a Republican who was Palin's campaign coordinator in the southeast Alaska city.
"People are learning that she pandered to us by saying, I'm for this' ... and then when she found it was politically advantageous for her nationally, abruptly she starts using the very term that she said was insulting," Weinstein said."
If that isn't "saying one thing in Ketchikan and another in St. Paul," I don't know what is.
What's worse? These are HER CONSTITUENTS that she used for political fodder. This fact, combined with the recent revelations of her crowing about pork IN HER OWN HANDWRITING are doubly damaging.
As far as I'm concerned, this self-described pit bull in lipstick, has played the victim card for the last time. She has had her "bring it on" moment. Please don't hesitate to confront her on every one of her distortions, lies and politically crafted attack lines.
Pretty please?
Comments