Skip to main content

Obama's Portraits for the National Portrait Gallery... Hmmmmmmm.

So about the portraits... They were unexpected. Much in the way that Barack Hussein Obama's presidency was unexpected. They are distinctive. They are well-crafted. They capture specific aspects of the essences of their subjects. But. They. Are. Different.

I knew that Kehinde Wiley was NOT going to deliver a standard Oval Office tribute. Obama knew that too. That's why he picked him. Obama's likeness is stupendous. His setting is disconcerting. But that's fine. There are otherbeautiful paintings of my President. This is the one that will greet visitors to the Portrait Gallery throughout history.

I'm a graphic design person, so Michelle Obama's likeness is growing on me. So clean, so stark. The graphic elements are stunning, the heart composed of hard lines and implied space is beautiful. She looks beautiful. Knowing that the skin tone choice is intentional helps. Again the Obamas chose their artists PURPOSEFULLY.
I think one thing I responded to unfavorably was that his seated posture somewhat diminishes his tall stature. Michelle's voluminous dress makes up for her pose, while Obama looks "compressed", especially against such a complex (and tall) backdrop.

Side note... Can anybody tell me what Dubya's portrait looked like (without Googling). ERRYBODY is going to remember Barack Obama's portrait. Michelle Obama's too. They stand out. They are memorable. That is not lost on me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Parties are NOT the same.

Thinking about the differences between the Dems and the Trump. Trump is promising "America First" jingoism without delivering anything but racism, while riding the economic tide of his predecessor. Consider what the Dems have been DEMANDED to fix. 1) Healthcare for all Americans 2) Student loan relief 3) A workable immigration solution 4) $15 min. wage and/or guaranteed income 5) Incremental gun regulation 6) Protecting the environment 7) Iran nuclear treaty 8) Thwarting Russian election interference 9) Reparations 10) Lowering taxes for middle class 11) Raising taxes for the 1% 12) Improving K-12 education 13) Rolling back Citizens United 14) Protecting Roe v. Wade 15) A satisfying DC Cinematic Universe (why not?) It's perfectly fine to be in your feelings if you are upset that this country is so f*cked that your particular issue is not being trumpeted by all (or any) of the Democratic primary candidates. It's even OK if you feel that the cur...

Open Letter to GOP recruiters

To whom it may concern: I am a telegenic, articulate, working, married father of two who owns his own house and a small business. Before you come knocking on my door, there are a few ground rules. Rule No. 1 No discussion of "The Party of Lincoln" without claiming Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms too. I know American history well enough, thank you. I also know that Thurmond was only a Democrat until the party decided to stand up for the rights of Black people. Then he jumped ship (while denying his own half-Black daughter) and led the drive to keeping a strong segregated state. Leave Lincoln in his grave (besides, we both know he didn't really emancipate very many don't we?) Rule No. 2 Liberal is not a bad word. It does not mean that Democrats love big government and spending tax dollars foolishly. That's Bush's job. Nor does it mean that I have been stroked and manipulated by a Leftist cabal that wants to think for me. Convince me on the merits of what YOU ...

An open letter to Bob Johnson

BJ... phi... bruh... Your tirade about Barack Obama is appalling. You earned your billion on the backs of ass-slapping videos, blaxploitation reruns and informercials and you have THE GALL to talk about being "insulted" that "we are so stupid?" Back at you, dawg. Incidentally, NOT ONE PERSON was confused about your thinly veiled reference about Obama's days "in the neighborhood." It was pathetic when the recently dismissed Clintonian flak floated it out there. Coming from you, it's traitorously venomous. We were smart enough to avoid buying tickets to "Who's Your Caddy?" and we're smart enough to understand your half-assed attempt at a smear. By the way, if you're going to "go there," have the balls to own up to it. Your backtrack about referring to his days as an organizer is even worse than the smear. Are we to understand that Obama's grass roots community leadership is somehow less legitimate than the...